jueves, 18 de junio de 2009
Battle With Death
In Clarice for example plagues have hit the city, and it has decayed several times “Several times it decayed, then burgeoned again, always keeping the first Clarice as an unparalleled model of every splendor…” (Calvino 106). In this city, although death has tried to burry it underground, survivors have always brought it back up from the ashes. One factor that makes death triumph is that it destroy anything on its path leaving no trace of life. Death has not triumphed in Clarice because what really matters is what the first civilians from Clarice left as their legacies. The real Clarice is always reconstructed, this symbolizes how death has tried to destroy this city but has never triumphed. In Brueghel’s painting we see how death has taken over this place leaving nothing more than lifeless corpses and destruction. Brueghel’s painting shows the desperation of the humans on this piece. Fire, skeletons and suicide show how human’s hope of life is lost. Everything they had is destroyed, the skeletons, representing death, are killing the ones left and to end their suffering some others are jumping over cliffs to die.
In another city, Eusapia, for example people have made death less feared. They have created an underground copy of this city to burry their death so that it seems as if they had never left the city. “And to make the leap from life to death less abrupt, the inhabitants have constructed an identical copy of their city, underground.” (Calvino 109). Another of the factors why death triumphs is because of the fear people has to it, which sometimes makes them succumb to death and leave their destiny in its hands. In this city, inhabitants have decreased the fear factor in death by creating this underground city so that it doesn’t seem so bad. The leap from life to death is not so hard. In Brueghel’s piece, people show their fear and desperation towards death when we see the expression in their faces, when we see them jumping over cliffs to end their suffering.
In Adelma, another city in Calvino’s book, we see how the cycle of life, although disturbed by death is not stopping. Although many people are dead or are dying, there are new generations being born who will, in the future take the places of the old and will again lead the city. “ I thought: “Perhaps Adelma is the city were you arrive dying and were each finds again the people he has known. This means I, too, am dead.” (Calvino 95) in this city we see how although people seem dead and old, they are still living. Marco Polo says he is dead too, but this can also mean all the other people are alive like him. This shows another factor of the triumph of death, which is inevitable. In this city people seem dead but they are not therefore, death has lost is inevitability since they will not change really when they die. In Brueghel’s piece death is inevitable since there is no sign of salvation, either they die killed by the skeletons, or by the armies, or they suicide, or they are already dead.
Death may or not be triumphant it depends on how you depict it… Factors such as Fear towards it, its inevitability, and its erasing of any trace of life makes death triumphant. In Calvino’s book, cities such as Adelma, Clarice, and Eusapia, have come closer to making death less triumphant by creating underground copies of the city, or by bringing it up again, or finally by loosing their life like characteristics without dying. We may say that death will never be triumphant if the legacy us humans leaves teach future generations, to live life to the fullest and to never loose their hope.
miƩrcoles, 10 de junio de 2009
domingo, 31 de mayo de 2009
Styles Upon Styles: Informative Articles
Away from Liberty

asking a friend at court how they came to fix on that determinate number,
he told me that his majesty’s mathematicians, having taken the height of
my body by the help of a quadrant, and finding it to exceed theirs in the
proportion of twelve to one" (30)
I don't understand if they are so small compared to Gulliver why doesn't he goes away. He is then given his liberty back after his pleadings pass through the Council and the majesty of Lilliput. But he has to follow 9 articles to prevent him from escaping or destroying any thing in Lilliput. It is kind of silly to think that Gulliver Being so big compared to them is treated like an animal in zoo.
There is something that I connect to this chapters in Gulliver and it is called the Elephants Metaphor. This is something that happens when Baby elephants that are born captive are chained to strong pillars so that they cant escape. Since they are small and their muscles haven't developed fully yet they obviously cant break the chains. They grow up with the idea that the chains are unbreakable and they loose all their hope of being free. When they are at their maximum size they can break these chains with no effort but since they have the memory of the chains being very strong they don't even try to break them.
Although this is not exactly what is happening to Gulliver it is very much alike. He is stronger than his capturers and can easily escape. The articles that they give them after they give him a partial liberty are nothing that he can't break but there is something that doesn't leave him escape. As the Elephant Metaphor, Gulliver is much bigger than his captors and can escape if he wanted. His metaphorical chains are really nothing compared to what he can do.
